To All DayakBaru readers,
Is “Critical Thinking” crucial for DBs? Can DBs acknowledge “Conservative Opinion” and “Conflict Opinion”?
1. How would Dayak be able to support, select and appoint a Dayak Chief Minister?
2. How would Dayak gain and/or achieve their Power of Autonomy? What are the findings and/or solutions?
3. What are the agendas for Dayak to reform, rebrand and transform their well being?
4. What are the goals to score?
5. Why are Dayaks easily victimized and backward?
6. When we talk about Dayak, it is not an individual task but the Dayaks themselves; so which and/or what platform is best to move the Dayak? NGO? Pro-Government? Pro-Opposition? Corporate?
7. Can we “Walk-the-Talk” without ideas/ initiatives? Is this “W.H.O.M.” (Know Who, Know How, Know Opportunity & Know Metatheory) approach applicable to “Talk-the-Walk”?
8. Is it impossible for Dayak to become a “Key Player” in Malaysia development?
9. What the Metatheory,Strategy, Framework and Initiative to mobilize Dayak grassroots development?
10. Have DayakBarus thoroughly identified the Dayaks’ “Disadvantages” and “Advantages” yet? OR have DayakBarus identified the Dayak “Strength, Weakness, Opportunity & Threat (SWOT)” yet?
11. Have Dayak leaders and/or DayakBarus analyze the Dayak “Political, Regional, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, International, Environmental, Demographic (PRESTLIED)” yet? Have Dayak/DBs find these solutions to walk-the-talk?
11. What are Dayak Perspectives and what are the “STEP” (Social, Technological, Economic, and Political) variables?
How are DayakBarus be able to response to all the above questionnaires?
Can you feed the whole village and every day? Will you be alive forever? Are you capable of working alone to feed the whole village or teamwork through “Unity” is better than the “Lone Ranger”?
Well…I just love this Chinese Confucius proverb:
GIVE A MAN A FISH AND HE WILL EAT FOR A DAY.
TEACH A MAN TO FISH AND HE WILL EAT FOR THE REST OF HIS LIFE.
Is “Critical Thinking” crucial for DBs? Can DBs acknowledge “Conservative Opinion” and “Conflict Opinion”?
1. How would Dayak be able to support, select and appoint a Dayak Chief Minister?
2. How would Dayak gain and/or achieve their Power of Autonomy? What are the findings and/or solutions?
3. What are the agendas for Dayak to reform, rebrand and transform their well being?
4. What are the goals to score?
5. Why are Dayaks easily victimized and backward?
6. When we talk about Dayak, it is not an individual task but the Dayaks themselves; so which and/or what platform is best to move the Dayak? NGO? Pro-Government? Pro-Opposition? Corporate?
7. Can we “Walk-the-Talk” without ideas/ initiatives? Is this “W.H.O.M.” (Know Who, Know How, Know Opportunity & Know Metatheory) approach applicable to “Talk-the-Walk”?
8. Is it impossible for Dayak to become a “Key Player” in Malaysia development?
9. What the Metatheory,Strategy, Framework and Initiative to mobilize Dayak grassroots development?
10. Have DayakBarus thoroughly identified the Dayaks’ “Disadvantages” and “Advantages” yet? OR have DayakBarus identified the Dayak “Strength, Weakness, Opportunity & Threat (SWOT)” yet?
11. Have Dayak leaders and/or DayakBarus analyze the Dayak “Political, Regional, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, International, Environmental, Demographic (PRESTLIED)” yet? Have Dayak/DBs find these solutions to walk-the-talk?
11. What are Dayak Perspectives and what are the “STEP” (Social, Technological, Economic, and Political) variables?
How are DayakBarus be able to response to all the above questionnaires?
Can you feed the whole village and every day? Will you be alive forever? Are you capable of working alone to feed the whole village or teamwork through “Unity” is better than the “Lone Ranger”?
Well…I just love this Chinese Confucius proverb:
GIVE A MAN A FISH AND HE WILL EAT FOR A DAY.
TEACH A MAN TO FISH AND HE WILL EAT FOR THE REST OF HIS LIFE.
No comments:
Post a Comment